Getting Inclusionary Housing Right

JOIN US VIRTUALLY ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24TH 12PM

Cities across Santa Clara County are considering this powerful tool to build more new affordable homes without subsidy.

But done wrong it can fall short, or even stop the development of new homes in its tracks. Learn how it works, and how to get it right!

Many of our local cities are joining forces right now in a shared nexus study, the wonky and in-depth analysis that assesses the feasibility of local residential development and the potential for developers of market-rate housing to add a share of affordable homes to their buildings.

If cities require too few affordable homes or affordability that’s too shallow, they leave public benefits on the table. Too much, and developers can’t build any housing at all.

Come hear about local cities that are getting it right: successfully using inclusionary housing policies to achieve mixed-income communities, generate funding to subsidize deeper levels of affordability, and gain valuable land for affordable homes!

RSVP
Apple Computer's spaceship campus in Cupertino
May 31, 2018

Cupertino & Mountain View Consider New Head Taxes

Share:

In the wake of Seattle’s action to adopt a $275 “Head Tax” which enacted a per-employee tax on large businesses to fund homelessness services and programs for affordable housing , both the Cupertino and Mountain View Councils have announced plans to study a similar tax.  San Jose and Sunnyvale already have similar business taxes in place, though neither of these communities uses the tax revenue collected for affordable housing programs..

In Mountain View, officials are looking to place an initiative on the November ballot, which is expected to raise an estimated $10 million annually.  While Seattle’s tax was directed to housing programs, initial discussions by the Mountain View City Council have suggested that the tax revenue would be used for transportation projects.

In Cupertino, elected officials are polling residents to determine interest in a similar tax, and how any tax revenue collected should be used.  While housing was raised as a potential target, we are not sure that housing would eventually be on the list of potential beneficiaries.

More to come on whether these tax proposals will go to the voters, whether they will get the needed votes, and whether other cities will join in and adopt similar taxes.